Opinion
Civil Action 5:11-CV-190 (HL)
06-20-2012
ROBERTO BAEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ROGERS, Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles (Doc. 44), entered on May 3, 2012, in which he recommends that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) be granted and Plaintiff's Motion to Procure an Order to Prevent Present and Future Harm (Doc. 29) be denied.
Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has made a de novo review of the Recommendation, and has carefully considered Plaintiff's objection. The Court overrules the objection and accepts and adopts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) is granted. Plaintiff's Motion to Procure an Order to Prevent Present and Future Harm (Doc. 29) is denied.
___________
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
mbh