From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baez v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2018
No. SA CV 17-00198-VBF-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2018)

Opinion

No. SA CV 17-00198-VBF-SHK

06-11-2018

JOSEPH ANTHONY BAEZ, Petitioner, v. CMF WARDEN ROBERT W. FOX, Respondent.


ORDER
Adopting the Report & Recommendation; Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition; Dismissing the Action With Prejudice; Terminating and Closing Action (JS-6)

This Court has reviewed the briefs (CM/ECF Documents ("Docs") 1, 10, and 14); the United States Magistrate Judge's March 16, 2018 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc 21); petitioner's April 19, 2018 objections to the R&R; and the applicable law. Respondent has not responded to the objections within the time allotted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court determines that petitioner's objections are unavailing and that there is no defect of law, fact, or logic in the R&R.

Accordingly, it is ordered that:

Petitioner's objection [Doc #23] is OVERRULED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc #21] is ADOPTED.

The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc # 1] is DENIED.

This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The case shall be terminated (JS-6).

As required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), final judgment will be entered as a separate document.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 11, 2018

/s/_________

Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Baez v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2018
No. SA CV 17-00198-VBF-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Baez v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ANTHONY BAEZ, Petitioner, v. CMF WARDEN ROBERT W. FOX, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 11, 2018

Citations

No. SA CV 17-00198-VBF-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2018)