From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baerg v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 16, 2008
271 S.W.3d 636 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED90968.

December 16, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pike County, Dan J. Dildine, Judge.

Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Cory Lee Atkins, Assistant Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.



ORDER


Movant, Jonathan Baerg, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to investigate or endorse a witness to testify.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Baerg v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 16, 2008
271 S.W.3d 636 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Baerg v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jonathan BAERG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Dec 16, 2008

Citations

271 S.W.3d 636 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)