From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Badock v. R.P. Lumber Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Jun 12, 2018
556 S.W.3d 98 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 106040

06-12-2018

Robert BADOCK, Respondent, v. R.P. LUMBER COMPANY, INC., Appellant.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: James C. Leritz, 555 Washington Avenue, Suite 600, St. Louis, MO 63101, LERITZ & PLUNKERT P.C. ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Candice Rose Burke, 11230 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Lake St. Louis, MO 63367, COYNE, CUNDIFF & HILLEMANN, P.C.


ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: James C. Leritz, 555 Washington Avenue, Suite 600, St. Louis, MO 63101, LERITZ & PLUNKERT P.C.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Candice Rose Burke, 11230 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Lake St. Louis, MO 63367, COYNE, CUNDIFF & HILLEMANN, P.C.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.

ORDER

Per Curiam

R.P. Lumber Company, Inc. appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding Robert Badock entitled to permanent total disability benefits. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Badock v. R.P. Lumber Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Jun 12, 2018
556 S.W.3d 98 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Badock v. R.P. Lumber Co.

Case Details

Full title:Robert BADOCK, Respondent, v. R.P. LUMBER COMPANY, INC., Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Jun 12, 2018

Citations

556 S.W.3d 98 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)