The circuit court sentenced Badger to serve seven years in the custody of the MDOC. Badger v. State, 290 So.3d 377, 380 (¶8) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020).
We take judicial notice of our own docket and the appellate court files. Badger v. State, 290 So.3d 377, 381 (¶14) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020).
We can therefore take judicial notice of the report since it appears on the docket of the Supreme Court. See Badger v. State, 290 So.3d 377, 381 (¶14) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (collecting cases acknowledging that this Court can take judicial notice of a filings on a docket). ¶51.
Ford bears the burden of proving that a recognized exception to the successive-motions bar applies. E.g. , Badger v. State , 290 So. 3d 377, 384 (¶29) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020). ¶8.
Bell bears the burden of proving that recognized exceptions to the statutory bars apply. See, e.g. , Badger v. State , 290 So. 3d 377, 384 (¶29) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020). ¶10.