From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Badea v. Seneca Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 1994
203 A.D.2d 98 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 12, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.).


In light of the fact that the evidence presented on the motion raises material questions concerning, inter alia, whether the instant fire extinguisher was properly installed and situated in the premises and as to what caused the extinguisher to fall, summary judgment was properly denied.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Badea v. Seneca Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 1994
203 A.D.2d 98 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Badea v. Seneca Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:RUXANDRA BADEA et al., Respondents, v. SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 98 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 839

Citing Cases

Weiss v. Fire Extinguisher Serv. Co.

Upon reargument, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of C W's motion which was for summary judgment…