From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Badalich v. Am. Fidelity

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Feb 11, 2010
No. 13-09-00144-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2010)

Opinion

No. 13-09-00144-CV

Delivered and filed February 11, 2010.

On Appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices YAÑEZ and VELA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellants perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 04-7211-E. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the appellants no longer wish to pursue this appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Badalich v. Am. Fidelity

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Feb 11, 2010
No. 13-09-00144-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2010)
Case details for

Badalich v. Am. Fidelity

Case Details

Full title:CARL FRANCIS BADALICH AND CARL F. BADALICH ASSOCIATES, Appellants, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Feb 11, 2010

Citations

No. 13-09-00144-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2010)