From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Badal v. Wilkinson

Supreme Court of New York
Jan 19, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 60565 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)

Opinion

No. 2021-09049 Docket No. V-23965-2019

01-19-2022

In the Matter of Cathyann Badal, appellant, v. Bryan Wilkinson, respondent.


M280977 AFA/

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J. MARK C. DILLON COLLEEN D. DUFFY BETSY BARROS FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

ORDER ON CERTIFICATION

Appeal by Cathyann Badal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 29, 2021. Pursuant to Family Court Act §§ 1118 and 1120, and upon the certification of Adetokunbo Oseni, dated January 4, 2022, it is

ORDERED that the respondent is granted leave to proceed as a poor person on the appeal, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to respond to the appeal:

Carol Kahn P.O. Box 1592 New York, NY 10028 212-744-7365

and it is further, ORDERED that assigned counsel shall promptly attempt to contact the respondent at the address provided by the Court, and shall notify the Case Manager assigned to the appeal on or before February 9, 2022, in writing, that she has done so and that either

(1) the respondent is interested in responding to the appeal, or

(2) the respondent is not interested in responding to the appeal, or that she has been unable to contact the respondent, and wishes to be relieved of the assignment.

LASALLE, P.J., DILLON, DUFFY, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Badal v. Wilkinson

Supreme Court of New York
Jan 19, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 60565 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)
Case details for

Badal v. Wilkinson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Cathyann Badal, appellant, v. Bryan Wilkinson, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of New York

Date published: Jan 19, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 60565 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)