From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bacon v. Skolinik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 8, 2011
2:07-cv-00821-KJD-RJJ (D. Nev. Aug. 8, 2011)

Opinion

2:07-cv-00821-KJD-RJJ

08-08-2011

PERCY LAVAE BACON, Petitioner, v. HOWARD SKOLINIK, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This closed habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the Court following upon a purported judicial notice filed by petitioner that was docketed as a motion (#109).

The present filing rehashes arguments or makes variations on arguments that petitioner made in prior filings (## 103 & 107) that the Court has rejected with assigned reasons (## 106 & 108) and as to which the Court of Appeals has denied a certificate of appealability (#113). As noted in the Court's prior order (#108), a "judicial notice" further is a fugitive document.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the filing docketed as a motion (#109) is DENIED. A certificate of appealability also is DENIED as to any appeal as to this frivolous filing.

KENT J. DAWSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bacon v. Skolinik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 8, 2011
2:07-cv-00821-KJD-RJJ (D. Nev. Aug. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Bacon v. Skolinik

Case Details

Full title:PERCY LAVAE BACON, Petitioner, v. HOWARD SKOLINIK, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 8, 2011

Citations

2:07-cv-00821-KJD-RJJ (D. Nev. Aug. 8, 2011)