Opinion
CASE NO. C 10-4311 PJH CASE NO. C 10-4310 PJH
10-05-2011
BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant. BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant.
Katherine Kelly Lutton (SBN 194971) Robert J. Kent (SBN 250905) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Christopher O. Green ( Admitted Pro Hac Vice ) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Ahmed J. Davis ( Admitted Pro Hac Vice ) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY Spencer Hosie (SBN 101777) George F. Bishop (SBN 89205) Diane S. Rice (SBN 118303) William P. Nelson (SBN 196091) HOSIE RICE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD Charles K. Verhoeven (SBN 170151) Jennifer A. Kash (SBN 203679) Howard Chen (SBN 26015) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE S
Katherine Kelly Lutton (SBN 194971)
Robert J. Kent (SBN 250905)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
Christopher O. Green (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
Ahmed J. Davis (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Spencer Hosie (SBN 101777)
George F. Bishop (SBN 89205)
Diane S. Rice (SBN 118303)
William P. Nelson (SBN 196091)
HOSIE RICE LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD
Charles K. Verhoeven (SBN 170151)
Jennifer A. Kash (SBN 203679)
Howard Chen (SBN 26015)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REVISED CONSTRUCTIONS
PATENT CASE
WHEREAS at the September 28, 2011 Markman hearing, Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton ordered that Defendants Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") and International Business Machines Corp. ("IBM") and Plaintiff BackWeb Technologies, Ltd. ("BackWeb") (collectively "the Parties") meet and confer in order to determine whether any compromises regarding the Parties' proposed claim constructions could be made;
WHEREAS Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton ordered that the Parties submit a letter detailing any compromises reached by the Parties by Wednesday October 5, 2011;
WHEREAS the Parties are currently in the process of meeting and conferring regarding whether any compromises can be made in order to conserve judicial resources;
WHEREAS the Parties believe that they will need until Friday October 14, 2011 to complete the meet and confer process in a meaningful manner;
NOW THEREFORE the parties hereby request the Court extend the deadline for submitting the Parties' statement on any claim construction compromises until Friday October 14, 2011.
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
Robert J. Kent
Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
HOSIE RICE LLP
William P. Nelson Chen (by Robert J.
Kent with permission )
William P. Nelson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP
Howard Y. Chen (by Robert J. Kent with
permission )
Howard Y. Chen
Attorneys for Defendant
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 section X-B regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
Robert J. Kent
Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton