From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Back-Skidders v. Leigh

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 16, 2020
185 A.D.3d 1252 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

528649

07-16-2020

In the Matter of Julia BACK–SKIDDERS, Petitioner, v. Michael LEIGH, Appellant.

Todd G. Monahan, Schenectady, for appellant.


Todd G. Monahan, Schenectady, for appellant.

Before: , Devine, Aarons, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Lynch, J.P.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Franklin County (Champagne, J.), entered January 28, 2019, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 4, committed respondent to jail for 180 days for willfully violating a prior order of support. Respondent is the father of a child (born in 2006). By an order of Family Court in November 2014, respondent was directed to pay $245 monthly in child support. In April 2015, petitioner – the caretaker relative of the child – commenced a violation proceeding alleging that respondent was in willful violation of the underlying support order. After respondent failed to appear at a hearing, the Support Magistrate issued a default order finding respondent in willful violation of the support order, recommending a term of incarceration not to exceed six months and referring the matter to Family Court for confirmation. Family Court confirmed the finding of willful violation and adjourned the matter for a determination of punishment. After a confirmation hearing at which respondent was present, the court, by order entered on January 28, 2019, committed respondent to jail for six months. Respondent appeals the order of commitment.

Respondent contends that Family Court erred in committing him to a jail term of six months. As the imposed period of incarceration has expired, respondent's appeal from the order of commitment is moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Patrick v. Botsford, 177 A.D.3d 1146, 1146 n., 115 N.Y.S.3d 109 [2019] ; Matter of Simmes v. Hotaling, 173 A.D.3d 1387, 1388, 100 N.Y.S.3d 577 [2019] ).

Devine, Aarons, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Back-Skidders v. Leigh

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 16, 2020
185 A.D.3d 1252 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Back-Skidders v. Leigh

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Julia BACK–SKIDDERS, Petitioner, v. Michael LEIGH…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 16, 2020

Citations

185 A.D.3d 1252 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
185 A.D.3d 1252

Citing Cases

Elizabeth S. v. Ben T.

If this threshold burden is met, the parent must then demonstrate that modification of the underlying order…

Zachery VV. v. Angela UU.

Like the father, the attorney for the child asserts that Family Court's determination is supported by a sound…