Opinion
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO.
Nos. 447, 448, 449 and 450.
Argued November 14, 15, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907.
Bachtel v. Wilson, ante p. 36, followed.
THE facts appear in the statement of the previous case which was argued simultaneously herewith.
Mr. William A. Lynch for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Charles C. Upham and Mr. John W. Craine for defendant in error.fn1
For abstracts of arguments see ante, pp. 37, 38.
The same question controls these cases as the one just decided, and, for the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, they are
Dismissed.