From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bachrach v. Farbenfabriken Bayer AG

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 19, 1975
36 N.Y.2d 696 (N.Y. 1975)

Summary

In Bachrach v Farbenfabriken Bayer AG (36 N.Y.2d 696), a libel and slander action, the court said (p 697): "In order to defeat summary judgment * * * it was incumbent upon plaintiff 'to submit evidentiary facts or materials, by affidavit or otherwise, rebutting the prima facie showing * * * and demonstrating the existence of a triable issue of ultimate fact' (Indig v Finkelstein, 23 N.Y.2d 728; CPLR 3212, subd [b]), all of which he has failed to establish."

Summary of this case from Phillips v. Arbuse

Opinion

Argued January 17, 1975

Decided February 19, 1975

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, CLIFFORD A. SCOTT, J.

Theodore H. Friedman and David G. Miller for appellant.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Allen F. Maulsby, Robert D. Joffe and Robert J. Dwyer for respondents.


MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. In this defamation action, after the completion of pretrial discovery, respondents moved for summary judgment on the ground that they did not authorize the publication of the advertisement about which plaintiff complains. The motion was supported by affidavits attesting to the fact that the publication was unauthorized and included an affidavit by the publisher, an independent foreign medical journal, averring that the advertisement complained of was printed erroneously and without the knowledge or approval of the respondents. Rather than submitting affidavits containing contrary factual averments, plaintiff concentrated his defense to the motion on an illusory assertion that the jury might disbelieve respondents' affiants. In order to defeat summary judgment, with this stated background, it was incumbent upon plaintiff "to submit evidentiary facts or materials, by affidavit or otherwise, rebutting the prima facie showing * * * and demonstrating the existence of a triable issue of ultimate fact" ( Indig v. Finkelstein, 23 N.Y.2d 728; CPLR 3212, subd. [b]), all of which he has failed to establish. Hope alone will not raise a triable issue.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Bachrach v. Farbenfabriken Bayer AG

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 19, 1975
36 N.Y.2d 696 (N.Y. 1975)

In Bachrach v Farbenfabriken Bayer AG (36 N.Y.2d 696), a libel and slander action, the court said (p 697): "In order to defeat summary judgment * * * it was incumbent upon plaintiff 'to submit evidentiary facts or materials, by affidavit or otherwise, rebutting the prima facie showing * * * and demonstrating the existence of a triable issue of ultimate fact' (Indig v Finkelstein, 23 N.Y.2d 728; CPLR 3212, subd [b]), all of which he has failed to establish."

Summary of this case from Phillips v. Arbuse
Case details for

Bachrach v. Farbenfabriken Bayer AG

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. BACHRACH, Appellant, v. FARBENFABRIKEN BAYER AG et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 19, 1975

Citations

36 N.Y.2d 696 (N.Y. 1975)
366 N.Y.S.2d 412
325 N.E.2d 872

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Pilot Petroleum Associates, Inc.

"Hope alone will not raise a triable issue." Bachrach v. Farbenfabriken Bayer AG, 36 N.Y.2d 696, 366 N.Y.S.2d…

United Nat. Ins. Co. v. Tunnel, Inc.

"Hope alone will not raise a triable issue." Bachrach v. Farbenfabriken Bayer AG, 36 N.Y.2d 696, 697, 366…