Opinion
October, 1906.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, for the reason that the order upon which the order of sequestration was based has been reversed by the Court of Appeals. All concurred.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Bachman v. Oliver
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1906
115 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Summaries of
Bachman v. Oliver
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1906
115 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for
Bachman v. Oliver
Case Details
Full title:Max Bachman, Respondent, v. Horace G. Oliver, as President of Rochester…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1906
Citations
115 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)