From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bachia v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1916
172 App. Div. 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

February, 1916.


Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the sole ground that there is no finding that the statutory bond required to maintain the action was ever filed or served. If it may be established by documentary evidence that the bond in question was filed and served, it may be availed of for the purpose of affirming the judgment on an application for a reargument. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Bachia v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1916
172 App. Div. 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Bachia v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:Richard A. Bachia and Another, etc., Respondents, v. C. Milton Rogers…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1916

Citations

172 App. Div. 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)