From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bachety v. Kinsella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1989
146 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

January 27, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The CPLR article 78 proceeding was properly dismissed since there is no allegation that up to this point an officer or body has failed to perform a duty enjoined upon it by law nor did any body or officer proceed in excess of jurisdiction (see, CPLR 7803). Any claims which anticipate such actions in the future are purely speculative.

The issue of whether an action for a declaratory judgment lies at the present time is different; however, here too we agree with the Supreme Court that any such judgment would presently be premature (see, CPLR 3001; New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Carey, 42 N.Y.2d 527). The existence of a controversy is contingent upon the happening of a future event "'which may never occur'" (Cuomo v Long Is. Light. Co., 71 N.Y.2d 349, 354; see also, New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Carey, supra, at 531). Under such circumstances, "any determination the court may make would be merely advisory since it can have no immediate effect and may never resolve anything (Borchard, Declaratory Judgments, pp 58-60)" (New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Carey, supra, at 531; see also, Cuomo v Long Is. Light. Co., supra, at 354-355).

Therefore, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the action and proceeding. Mollen, P.J., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bachety v. Kinsella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1989
146 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Bachety v. Kinsella

Case Details

Full title:SONDRA BACHETY, Appellant, v. JULIETTE KINSELLA et al., Respondents, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1989

Citations

146 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Town of Islip v. Zalak

Actual harm will occur only if the defendants' currently pending application for a permit is denied. In…

Town of Islip v. Cuomo

The harm which the plaintiffs anticipate, i.e., an enlargement of the area in which construction of…