From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bacha v. Chavez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 16, 2022
2:22-cv-00652-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00652-TLN-CKD

06-16-2022

SAMMY BACHA, Plaintiff, v. CHAVEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge.

On May 9, 2022, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed April 25, 2022, denying Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 8.) Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed April 25, 2022, is AFFIRMED and Plaintiff's request for reconsideration (ECF No. 8) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Bacha v. Chavez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 16, 2022
2:22-cv-00652-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Bacha v. Chavez

Case Details

Full title:SAMMY BACHA, Plaintiff, v. CHAVEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 16, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00652-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2022)