Opinion
No. 11-7070
11-18-2011
JOHN BACCUS, a/k/a John Roosevelt Baccus, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEWIS A. SCOTT, Et Al, Defendant - Appellee.
John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (9:10-cv-02862-DCN)
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baccus v. Scott, No. 9:10-cv-02862-DCN (D.S.C. July 25, 2011). We deny Baccus's motions to compel the district court clerk's office to provide copies of documents, for a transcript at Government expense, to review the record in the clerk's office, and to consolidate this appeal with No. 11-7101.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED