From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BACA v. SCRIBNER

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 17, 2008
No. CIV S-05-0506 RRB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0506 RRB KJM P.

January 17, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's January 3, 2008 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.


Summaries of

BACA v. SCRIBNER

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 17, 2008
No. CIV S-05-0506 RRB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2008)
Case details for

BACA v. SCRIBNER

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO W. BACA, Petitioner, v. A.K. SCRIBNER, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 17, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0506 RRB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2008)