From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baca v. Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jan 8, 2013
No. 12-CV-00156 BRB/WDS (D.N.M. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-CV-00156 BRB/WDS

01-08-2013

CHARMAINE BACA, Plaintiff, v. MORRIS RODRIGUEZ, in his individual capacity, EDIE JOHNSON, ARLENE HICKSON, and BRANDI MILLER in their individual and official capacities, and CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendants.


ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Extend Expert Disclosure Deadlines [Doc. 49]; and the Court being fully advised of the premises; and Defendants having no objection; and there being no resulting effect upon the case management deadlines established in this case;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's unopposed motion is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the filing of Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures is February 14, 2013; and the deadline for the filing of Defendants' Rule 26(a)(2) deadline is March 13, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

HONORABLE W. DANIEL SCHNEIDER
Submitted by: Mark Fine


Summaries of

Baca v. Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jan 8, 2013
No. 12-CV-00156 BRB/WDS (D.N.M. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Baca v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:CHARMAINE BACA, Plaintiff, v. MORRIS RODRIGUEZ, in his individual…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

No. 12-CV-00156 BRB/WDS (D.N.M. Jan. 8, 2013)