From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Babb v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Sep 21, 2010
NO. 5:10CV00025 JMM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 21, 2010)

Opinion

NO. 5:10CV00025 JMM.

September 21, 2010


ORDER


The Court has received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After a careful, de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. This proceeding and the petitions for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by petitioner Jason Babb are dismissed. All requested relief is denied, and, in accordance with Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is denied. Judgment will be entered for respondent Ray Hobbs.

The Court is not convinced that Babb can "demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong." See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Babb v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Sep 21, 2010
NO. 5:10CV00025 JMM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Babb v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:JASON BABB PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, interim Director of the Arkansas…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Sep 21, 2010

Citations

NO. 5:10CV00025 JMM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 21, 2010)