From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Babb v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 8, 2021
20-cv-12634 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 8, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-12634

06-08-2021

KRISTILIN BABB, Plaintiff, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND/CORRECT (ECF No. 12)

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 7, 2021, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff Kristilin Babb's Motion to Amend/Correct. (See Mot., ECF No. 12.) In that motion, Babb sought leave to file an Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated on the record, the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that Babb seeks leave to file an Amended Complaint adding National Fire and Insurance as the personal injury protection (PIP) carrier. The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the extent that Babb seeks a ruling that the Amended Complaint relates back to the filing of the original Complaint. The Court will address the relation-back issue later in this action as appropriate. Once an Amended Complaint is filed, Defendants may file an Answer and/or any motion that they believe is appropriate at that time.

Babb shall file her Amended Complaint by no later than June 21, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Babb v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 8, 2021
20-cv-12634 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Babb v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KRISTILIN BABB, Plaintiff, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jun 8, 2021

Citations

20-cv-12634 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 8, 2021)