Opinion
1:22-cv-390
07-31-2023
BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION, on behalf of its member Thomas Leon Gibson, also Known as Black Feather and Coosa Nation, a sister Nation and Juridical Personality, Plaintiff, v. CHIEF TRAVIS STROUD, OFFICER DEVON WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT BRENT J. MACFARLAND, HIGH POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAGISTRATE JOSHUA PASCHAL, MAGISTRATE J.N FOSTER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY AVERY L. CRUMP, J. ANDREWS HOWE, ESQ., THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, GOVERNOR ROY COOPER, JOSH STEIN, ERIC BOYETTE, TORRE JESSUP, WAYNE GOODWIN, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, JONATHAN EVANS, EVERETT GUYNN, and DAVIDSON COUNTY Defendant(s).
ORDER
This matter is before this court for review of the Recommendation filed on June 7, 2023, by the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (Doc. 14.) In the Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency Injunction, (Doc. 12), be denied, and that the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (Doc. 11), be denied without prejudice. The Recommendation was served on the parties to this action on June 7, 2023. (Doc. 15.) Plaintiff timely filed objections, (Doc. 16), to the Recommendation.
This court is required to make a de novo determination of those portions of the [Magistrate Judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the [M]agistrate [J]udge....[,] or recommit the matter to the [M]agistrate [J]udge with instructions. Id.
This court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Recommendation to which objections were made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. This court therefore adopts the Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 14), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Request for Immediate Emergency Injunction, (Doc. 12), is DENIED, and that the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (Doc. 11), is DENIED without prejudice to refiling with a proper complaint by individuals proceeding on their own behalf or through counsel admitted to practice in this District.