Opinion
1:22-cv-390
01-27-2023
ORDER
This matter is before this court for review of the Recommendation filed on September 22, 2022, by the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (Doc. 5.) In the Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be denied and that the Complaint in this action be dismissed without prejudice to any interested individuals filing suit and bringing their own claims, accompanied by the filing fee or their own Application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Recommendation was served on the parties to this action on September 22, 2022 (Doc. 6). Plaintiff timely filed objections (Doc. 7) to the Recommendation, and Defendants J. Andrew Howe and Davidson County responded. (Doc. 8.)
This court is required to Amake a de novo determination of those portions of the [Magistrate Judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.@ 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This court Amay accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the [M]agistrate [J]udge. . . . [O]r recommit the matter to the [M]agistrate [J]udge with instructions.@ Id.
This court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Recommendation to which objections were made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. This court therefore adopts the Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 5) is ADOPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ba-Pakal Luma Nation's
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (Doc. 1), is DENIED and this action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-filing by individual plaintiffs.
A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.