If reasonable persons could disagree after considering the evidence, a genuine issue exists. B & P Restaurant Group, LLC v. Delta Administrative Services, LLC, 18-442 (La. App. 5 Cir. 9/4/19), 279 So.3d 492, 501, writ denied, 19-01755 (La. 1/14/20), 291 So.3d 685.
An issue is "moot" when a judgment or decree on that issue has been "deprived of practical significance" or "made abstract or purely academic." B&P Rest. Grp., LLC v. Delta Admin. Servs., LLC , 18-442 (La. App. 5 Cir. 9/4/19), 279 So.3d 492, 498, writ denied , 19-1755 (La. 1/14/20), 291 So.3d 685. A case is "moot" when a rendered judgment or decree can serve no useful purpose and give no practical relief or effect. I
An issue is "moot" when a judgment or decree on that issue has been "deprived of practical significance" or "made abstract or purely academic." B&P Rest. Grp., LLC v. Delta Admin. Servs., LLC , 18-442 (La. App. 5 Cir. 9/4/19), 279 So.3d 492, 498, writ denied , 19-1755 (La. 1/14/20), 291 So.3d 685, quotingCat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans through Dep't of Fin. , 98-601 (La. 10/20/98), 720 So.2d 1186. An issue is also moot when "there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged violation will recur and when interim relief or events have completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged violation."
B & P Rest. Grp., LLC v. Delta Admin. Servs., LLC , 18-442 (La. App. 5 Cir. 9/4/19), 279 So.3d 492, 499, writ denied sub nom.B&P Rest. Grp., LLC v. Delta Admin. Servs., LLC , 19-01755 (La. 1/14/20), 291 So.3d 685, quotingBourgeois v. Allstate Ins. Co., et al. , 15-451 (La. App. 5 Cir. 12/23/15), 182 So.3d 1177, 1180. The 2013 Act of Donation, introduced into evidence at the hearing, contained language similar to that contained in the Judgment of Possession issued in Vincent's succession.
B & P Rest. Grp., LLC v. Delta Admin. Servs., LLC, 18-442 (La. App. 5 Cir. 9/4/19), 279 So.3d 492, 501, writ denied sub nom. B&P Rest. Grp., LLC v. Delta Admin. Servs., LLC, 19-1755 (La. 1/14/20), 291 So.3d 685.
B & P Rest. Grp., LLC v. Delta Admin. Servs., LLC, 18-442 (La. App. 5 Cir. 9/4/19), 279 So.3d 492, 500. In her petition, Ms. Korrapati alleged that Augustino was contractually and legally obligated to obtain a permit, and that when she requested a copy of the permit from Mr. Perdomo, he forwarded her an application for a permit, asserting that it was the permit.