From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Azzaro v. County of Allegheny

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 31, 1996
91 F.3d 471 (3d Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-3253.

Argued August 30, 1996.

Decided July 31, 1996. Order Vacating Opinion Upon Grant of Rehearing En Banc August 30, 1996.

Editor's Note: this opinion will be withdrawn from bound volume publication.

Michael J. Healey (argued), Healey Davidson Hornack, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellant.

Ira Weiss, County Solicitor, Robert L. McTiernan, Ass't County Solicitor (argued), Caroline Liebenguth, Ass't County Solicitor, Allegheny County Law Dep't, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellees.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 93-1589)

Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, SAROKIN, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

Judge Sarokin retired from office on July 31, 1996.

as to panel rehearing only.



ORDER

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above appeal, it is

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court vacate the panel's opinion and judgment dated July 31, 1996 and list the above case for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the court.

By the Court,

/s/ Dolores K. Sloviter, Chief Judge


Summaries of

Azzaro v. County of Allegheny

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 31, 1996
91 F.3d 471 (3d Cir. 1996)
Case details for

Azzaro v. County of Allegheny

Case Details

Full title:BEVERLY AZZARO, APPELLANT v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY; TOM FOERSTER, AN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jul 31, 1996

Citations

91 F.3d 471 (3d Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Fogarty v. Boles

To establish a causal link between the protected speech and his removal from the three extracurricular…