Opinion
21-CV-62270-RAR
03-25-2022
AZURE COLLEGE, INC., Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.
ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RODOLFO A. RUIZ II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon United States Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 66] (“Report”), entered on March 9, 2022. The Report recommends that the Court deny Third-Party Defendant Pistus HHC, LLC's (“Pistus”) Motion to Dismiss Third Party Complaint [ECF No. 60] (“Motion”). Report at 1. Pistus filed objections to the Report on March 23, 2022 [ECF No. 67] (“Objections”).
When a magistrate judge's “disposition” has been properly objected to, district courts must review the disposition de novo. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). Because Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report, the Court has conducted a de novo review of Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss's legal and factual findings.
The Court having carefully reviewed the Motion [ECF No. 60], Third-Party Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A.'s Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Third Party Complaint [ECF No. 63], Pistus's Reply to Third-Party Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 65], the Report, the Objections, the factual record, and applicable law, and being otherwise fully advised, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report [ECF No. 66] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.
2. Pistus's Motion [ECF No. 60] is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED