From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aztec Oil Co. v. Dague

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 15, 1926
247 P. 376 (Okla. 1926)

Opinion

No. 17324

Opinion Filed June 15, 1926.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Case-Made — Invalidity of Order Extending Time — Effect.

Where the time for serving case-made has expired, an order of extension made subsequent thereto is void, and this court is without jurisdiction to review the case on appeal.

Appeal from Court of Common Pleas, Tulsa County; Saul A. Yeager, Judge.

Action between the Aztec Oil Company and A. B.C. Dague. From the judgment, the former appeals. Dismissed.

West, Gibson. Sherman, Davidson Hull, for plaintiff in error.

Lashley Rambo, for defendant in error.


Motion for new trial was overruled on the 19th day of October. 1925, and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was given 45 days from date of order in which to serve case-made. This time expired on the 3rd day of December, 1925. Case-made was not served within this time, and on the 4th day of December, 1925, the court made a further order of extension. Defendant in error moves the court to dismiss appeal on the ground that the trial court was without jurisdiction to make the order of December 4, 1925, for the reason that the time granted previously had expired.

Where the time for serving case-made has expired, an order of extension made subsequent thereto is void, and this court is without jurisdiction to review the case on appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Aztec Oil Co. v. Dague

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 15, 1926
247 P. 376 (Okla. 1926)
Case details for

Aztec Oil Co. v. Dague

Case Details

Full title:AZTEC OIL CO. v. DAGUE

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 15, 1926

Citations

247 P. 376 (Okla. 1926)
121 Okla. 47