Opinion
Civ. 23-4355 (RMB-AMD)
01-30-2024
DANIEL AZCONA, Plaintiff v. NJ DOC STAFF, et al., Defendants
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
OPINION
RENEE MARIE BUMB, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court upon the filing by Pro Se Plaintiff Daniel Azcona of an application to proceed without prepayment of the filing fees (“IFP Application” Dkt. No. 1-2) and a civil rights complaint (Compl., Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff's IFP application establishes his financial eligibility to proceed without payment of the filing fee, and it will be granted. When a person is granted IFP status, the Court must screen the complaint for dismissal, and dismiss the complaint if it (1) is frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
The complaint is rambling, incoherent, apparently delusional, and duplicative of a number of complaints recently filed in this Court by Plaintiff.Because the Court can not discern any legal claim in the complaint upon which relief may be granted, the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice.
See Azcona v. State of New Jersey, et al., 23-3776(RMB); Azcona v. NJDOC Staff, et al., 23-3852(RMB); Azcona v. State of New Jersey, et al, 23-4076(RK); Azcona v. NJDOC Staff Male Female, 23-20804(RK).
An appropriate order will be entered.