From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Azco Realty, Inc. v. Vill. at Culfstream Park

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Nov 19, 2014
No. 3D14-984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2014)

Opinion

No. 3D14-984

11-19-2014

Azco Realty, Inc., Appellant, v. The Village at Culfstream Park, etc., et al., Appellees.

Katz, Barron, Squitero, Faust, Friedberg, English & Allen and Jon W. Zeder, for appellant. Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford and Shelley H. Leinicke and Jonathan S. Miller (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellees.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Consolidated: 3D14-0005
Lower Tribunal No. 12-24520
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge. Katz, Barron, Squitero, Faust, Friedberg, English & Allen and Jon W. Zeder, for appellant. Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford and Shelley H. Leinicke and Jonathan S. Miller (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellees. Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and EMAS and SCALES, JJ. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Geneva Inv., Ltd. v. Trafalgar Developers, Ltd., 274 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Bradley v. Banks, 260 So. 2d 256, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) ("The appellee was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs' claim for a portion of a real estate commission because there was no genuine issue of material fact concerning the proposition that [plaintiff-appellant] was not registered as a real estate broker or salesman at the time the act or service was performed.").


Summaries of

Azco Realty, Inc. v. Vill. at Culfstream Park

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Nov 19, 2014
No. 3D14-984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2014)
Case details for

Azco Realty, Inc. v. Vill. at Culfstream Park

Case Details

Full title:Azco Realty, Inc., Appellant, v. The Village at Culfstream Park, etc., et…

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Nov 19, 2014

Citations

No. 3D14-984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2014)