From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Azcarate v. Laughlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 23, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-24-DCB-JMR (S.D. Miss. Mar. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-24-DCB-JMR

03-23-2012

MARIO GERMAN AZCARATE, #90126-11 PETITIONER v. VANCE LAUGHLIN RESPONDENT


ORDER

This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court, and there being no objections thereto filed by either party, and the Court, having fully reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge John M. Roper be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court, and that Petitioner Mario German Azcarate's Petition [1] for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed as moot.

A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with this Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

David Bramlette

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Azcarate v. Laughlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 23, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-24-DCB-JMR (S.D. Miss. Mar. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Azcarate v. Laughlin

Case Details

Full title:MARIO GERMAN AZCARATE, #90126-11 PETITIONER v. VANCE LAUGHLIN RESPONDENT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 23, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-24-DCB-JMR (S.D. Miss. Mar. 23, 2012)