From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ayyub v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 2002
291 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

CA 01-01661

February 1, 2002.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Allegany County (Nenno, J.), entered October 30, 2000, which, inter alia, denied the cross motion of defendant CGU Insurance Company for summary judgment.

BROWN KELLY, LLP, BUFFALO (RENATA KOWALCZUK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

J. THOMAS FUOCO, ANGELICA, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., WISNER, SCUDDER, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.


It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum:

Rukhsana Ayyub (plaintiff) was injured when she was struck by a motor vehicle operated by defendant Julie Ann Smith. After plaintiffs commenced this action seeking payment on their claim for no-fault benefits, CGU Insurance Company (defendant), Smith's insurer, requested a second medical examination of plaintiff. Supreme Court properly denied the cross motion of defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it based upon plaintiff's refusal to submit to that examination. Even assuming, arguendo, that the second examination is a condition precedent to coverage, we conclude that there is an issue of fact whether, by its actions prior to the commencement of the action, defendant "denied or repudiated the claim sufficient to excuse [plaintiffs]" from compliance with that condition precedent ( Raymond v. Allstate Ins. Co., 94 A.D.2d 301; see, Lentini Bros. Moving Stor. Co. v. New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 53 N.Y.2d 835, 836; Beckley v. Otsego County Farmers Coop. Fire Ins. Co., 3 A.D.2d 190, 194, lv dismissed 2 N.Y.2d 990). Furthermore, defendant failed to establish in support of its cross motion that the request for a second medical examination was reasonable under the terms of the policy.


Summaries of

Ayyub v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 2002
291 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Ayyub v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:RUKHSANA AYYUB AND MOHAMMED AYYUB, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JULIE ANN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 1, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
737 N.Y.S.2d 493

Citing Cases

Millennium Med. Diagnostics v. Liberty Mut

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Term properly determined that the defendant was…

Lee v. American Transit Ins. Co.

In the present case, there are issues of fact as to whether the defendant insurance company repudiated…