From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aytes v. Department of Revenue

Tax Court of Oregon
Feb 14, 2019
TC-MD 190018R (Or. T.C. Feb. 14, 2019)

Opinion

TC-MD 190018R

02-14-2019

ANGELA EASTMAN AYTES and AARON M. AYTES, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant.


DECISION

RICHARD DAVIS MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

This matter came before the court on Defendant's Answer, filed January 23, 2019. Plaintiffs appeal Defendant's Notice of Assessment, dated December 7, 2018, for the 2013 tax year. Plaintiffs stated that Defendant's notice was in error because "I was a nonresident military spouse" and requested reversal of the "Tax $3, 850, penalties $962.50, [and] interest $879.90." (Compl at 1.) In Defendant's Answer it agreed that "Plaintiff is a non-resident military spouse and is eligible for the military subtraction." (Ans at 1.) Defendant stated that it "will reverse the denial of the Military subtraction and reverse the $3, 850 tax and the penalty and interest associated with the adjustment." (Id.)

A case management conference was held on February 12, 2019, to consider Plaintiffs' appeal. Plaintiffs failed to appear at that case management conference, however, because the parties are in agreement, this case is ready for decision. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiffs are eligible for the military subtraction. Defendant will cancel its Notice of Assessment, dated December 7, 2018, an issue any applicable refund with statutory interest.


Summaries of

Aytes v. Department of Revenue

Tax Court of Oregon
Feb 14, 2019
TC-MD 190018R (Or. T.C. Feb. 14, 2019)
Case details for

Aytes v. Department of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA EASTMAN AYTES and AARON M. AYTES, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Tax Court of Oregon

Date published: Feb 14, 2019

Citations

TC-MD 190018R (Or. T.C. Feb. 14, 2019)