From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ayscue v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Oct 1, 2009
No. 5:08-CV-595-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2009)

Opinion

No. 5:08-CV-595-FL.

October 1, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M R") of United States Magistrate Judge William A. Webb, regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling.

The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of Magistrate Judge William A. Webb as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintiffs motion is DENIED, defendant's motion is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ayscue v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Oct 1, 2009
No. 5:08-CV-595-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Ayscue v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MAE AYSCUE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division

Date published: Oct 1, 2009

Citations

No. 5:08-CV-595-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2009)

Citing Cases

Sweeney v. Colvin

This court has construed that rating as consistent with limitations to occasional, brief, and superficial…

Larsen v. Astrue

Id. Jobs whose level of interaction is defined as "not significant" in the DOT, have been held to be…