Opinion
No. 05-07-00277-CV
Filed: July 3, 2007.
On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 06-07012-B.
Before Justices MORRIS, FRANCIS, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 7, 2007, appellant filed a notice of appeal in this case indicating he was appealing the trial court's "order to quash writ of possession." By letter dated May 18, 2007, we directed appellant to file a letter brief regarding this Court's jurisdiction. Appellant responded, but his letter brief fails to explain how this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal.
Appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and such interlocutory orders as the legislature deems appealable. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1997, no writ). An order sustaining a motion to quash a writ of possession is not an appealable interlocutory order. See Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 15.064(a) (Vernon 2002); see also Qualia v. Qualia, 37 S.W.3d 128, 129(Tex.App.-San Antonio 2001, no pet.).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.