From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ayers v. Pines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Nov 7, 2018
Civ. No. 18-1015 MV/GJF (D.N.M. Nov. 7, 2018)

Opinion

Civ. No. 18-1015 MV/GJF

11-07-2018

ERIC D. AYERS, Plaintiff, v. MAXWELL H. PINES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's "Motion for Appointment of Attorney" ("Motion") [ECF No. 3]. The Court will deny the Motion. There is no right to appointment of counsel in a civil rights case. Instead, the decision whether to appoint counsel rests in the sound discretion of the Court. Beaudry v. Corrections Corp. of America, 331 F.3d 1164, 1169 (10th Cir. 2003); MacCuish v. United States, 844 F.2d 733, 735 (10th Cir. 1988). In making that determination, the district court should consider the merits of the litigant's claims, the nature and complexity of the factual and legal issues, and the litigant's ability to investigate the facts and to present his claims. Hill v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 393 F.3d 1111, 1115 (10th Cir. 2004). The Court has reviewed the Complaint in light of the foregoing factors. Plaintiff Ayers appears to understand the issues in the case and to be representing himself in an intelligent and capable manner. See Lucero v. Gunter, 52 F.3d 874, 878 (10th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the Court will deny the Motion.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion filed by Plaintiff Eric D. Ayers [ECF No. 3] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

THE HONORABLE GREGORY J. FOURATT

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Ayers v. Pines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Nov 7, 2018
Civ. No. 18-1015 MV/GJF (D.N.M. Nov. 7, 2018)
Case details for

Ayers v. Pines

Case Details

Full title:ERIC D. AYERS, Plaintiff, v. MAXWELL H. PINES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Nov 7, 2018

Citations

Civ. No. 18-1015 MV/GJF (D.N.M. Nov. 7, 2018)