From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ayers v. Murray

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 26, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-2396 (E.D. Pa. May. 26, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-2396.

May 26, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2011, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo and the Petitioner's Motion in Objection to the Report and Recommendation it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as time-barred;
3. A certificate of appealability should not issue since, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner has failed to show that a reasonable jurist could conclude that the Court is incorrect in dismissing the petition as time-barred.


Summaries of

Ayers v. Murray

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 26, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-2396 (E.D. Pa. May. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Ayers v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:CLAYTON AYERS, III v. JOHN MURRAY, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-2396 (E.D. Pa. May. 26, 2011)