Opinion
2013-04-18
Angel Aybar, Rome, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.
Angel Aybar, Rome, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Gilpatric, J.), entered April 20, 2012 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision denying petitioner's application to participate in the shock incarceration program.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the denial of his application to participate in the shock incarceration program ( seeCorrection Law § 867[2]; 7 NYCRR 1800.3[c] ). “Participation in the shock incarceration program shall be a privilege,” however, not a right (Correction Law § 867[5]; see People v. Providence, 14 A.D.3d 884, 885, 787 N.Y.S.2d 739 [2005],lv. denied*9204 N.Y.3d 856, 797 N.Y.S.2d 430, 830 N.E.2d 329 [2005];Matter of Gomez v. Obot, 170 A.D.2d 1036, 1037, 566 N.Y.S.2d 426 [1991],lv. denied78 N.Y.2d 856, 574 N.Y.S.2d 937, 580 N.E.2d 409 [1991] ). Inasmuch as petitioner is incarcerated due to his efforts to sell several kilograms of cocaine, we agree with Supreme Court that the denial of his application was rational ( see Matter of Gomez v. Obot, 170 A.D.2d at 1037, 566 N.Y.S.2d 426). His remaining arguments have been examined and found to lack merit.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.