From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ayala v. Tasty Baking Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 10, 2024
Civil Action 22-3849 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 10, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-3849

01-10-2024

JOSE AYALA, SR., Plaintiff, v. TASTY BAKING COMPANY, and LOCAL 6 BAKERY CONFECTIONERY AND TOBACCO WORKERS INTERNATIONAL, Defendants.


ORDER

WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Tasty Baking Company's Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Counsel (ECF No. 44) and all responses and replies thereto (ECF Nos. 45, 50), it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is DENIED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the question of whether Plaintiff's Counsel Seth Carson violated Pennsylvania Rule of Processional Conduct 1.8(c) in connection with actions described in the opinion accompanying this order is REFERRED to the Disciplinary Committee for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.


Summaries of

Ayala v. Tasty Baking Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 10, 2024
Civil Action 22-3849 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Ayala v. Tasty Baking Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE AYALA, SR., Plaintiff, v. TASTY BAKING COMPANY, and LOCAL 6 BAKERY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 10, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-3849 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 10, 2024)