From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ayala v. Jamaica Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1985
109 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 4, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

In LeBovici v. Jamaica Sav. Bank ( 81 A.D.2d 150, affd 56 N.Y.2d 522) it was conclusively determined that the same exact language as that complained of here was neither misleading nor constituted a misrepresentation such as to warrant the imposition of equitable estoppel on defendant. Because some form of misrepresentation is an essential element of each of plaintiff's causes of action, the doctrine of stare decisis compels our decision here.

We have considered the other contentions raised by plaintiff and find they lack merit. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur. [ 121 Misc.2d 564.]


Summaries of

Ayala v. Jamaica Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1985
109 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Ayala v. Jamaica Savings Bank

Case Details

Full title:MYRINA AYALA, Appellant, v. JAMAICA SAVINGS BANK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)