From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Axman v. Florida DPT of Highway Safety

Supreme Court of Florida
May 10, 2010
36 So. 3d 655 (Fla. 2010)

Opinion

No. SC10-621.

May 10, 2010.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D09-4843, 2009-CA-001243.


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 11 So. 2d 889, 890 (Fla. 1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus" is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"), approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Axman v. Florida DPT of Highway Safety

Supreme Court of Florida
May 10, 2010
36 So. 3d 655 (Fla. 2010)
Case details for

Axman v. Florida DPT of Highway Safety

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL GEORGE AXMAN, Petitioner(s) v. FLORIDA DPT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 10, 2010

Citations

36 So. 3d 655 (Fla. 2010)