Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02872-JLK-KLM
03-05-2012
MINUTE ORDER
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Determination of Law [Docket No. 44; Filed January 17, 2012] (the "Motion"). On February 7, 2012, Defendant filed a Response to the Motion [#46]. Plaintiffs did not file a Reply. In the Motion, Plaintiffs seek leave to file a Surreply [#44-1] in connection with Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#33]. The stated reason underlying the request "is to clarify possible ambiguities created by defendant's Reply." Motion [#44] at 1.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#44] is DENIED. Surreplies are not contemplated by the Federal or Local Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court is adequately advised of the issues on the parties' present briefings.