From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AXA FINANCIAL, 03-07-00078-CV

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 29, 2007
No. 03-07-00078-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 29, 2007)

Opinion

No. 03-07-00078-CV

Filed: March 29, 2007.

Appeal from Original Proceeding from Travis County.

Before Justices PATTERSON, PEMBERTON and WALDROP.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relators AXA Financial, Inc., and others bring this original proceeding seeking a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to order arbitration of all claims in the underlying lawsuit. Relators moved to compel arbitration under both the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C.A. §§ 1- 16 (West 1999), and the Texas Arbitration Act, Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. §§ 171.001-.098 (West 2005). The trial court denied relators' motion. In addition to this original proceeding based on the federal act, relators have filed an interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court's denial of relators' motion to compel arbitration under the state arbitration act. See AXA Financial, Inc. v. Roberts, No. 03-07-00079-CV (Tex.App.-Austin, filed Feb. 12, 2007).

Texas law permits an accelerated appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration under the state arbitration act. Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 171.098. When proceeding in the state courts, there is no similar right of appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration under the federal act. In re Valero Energy Corp., 968 S.W.2d 916, 916 (Tex. 1998) (per curiam). Although the supreme court has held that mandamus relief is appropriate when a state court erroneously denies a motion to compel arbitration under the federal act, see Jack B. Anglin Co. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 271-72 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding), the supreme court has advised that "the better course of action for a court of appeals confronted with an interlocutory appeal and a mandamus proceeding seeking to compel arbitration would be to consolidate the two proceedings and render a decision disposing of both simultaneously." In re Valero Energy Corp., 968 S.W.2d at 916-17. Following the supreme court's guidance in In re Valero Energy Corp., we decline to consider relators' petition for writ of mandamus at this time, and we consolidate the instant proceedings into the pending appeal in cause number 03-07-00079-CV. The record and all pertinent documents from this proceeding will be transferred into cause number 03-07-00079-CV. There will be no further activity in cause number 03-07-00078-CV.


Summaries of

AXA FINANCIAL, 03-07-00078-CV

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 29, 2007
No. 03-07-00078-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 29, 2007)
Case details for

AXA FINANCIAL, 03-07-00078-CV

Case Details

Full title:IN RE AXA FINANCIAL, INC.; AXA ADVISORS, L.L.C.; AXA EQUITABLE LIFE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Mar 29, 2007

Citations

No. 03-07-00078-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 29, 2007)