From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aws Management, LLC v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Feb 1, 2010
05-1056 CW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2010)

Opinion

          LGI LLP, BRADLEY A. PATTERSON, Esq. (State Bar No. 155482), Irvine CA, Attorney for Plaintiffs.

          JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332), United States Attorney, THOMAS MOORE (ASBN 4305-T780), Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division, CYNTHIA STIER (DCBN 423256), Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, ROBERT J. HIGGINS (DCBN 242966), Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, BART D. JEFFRESS (CT Juris No. 419184), Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice Attorneys for Defendant United States of America.

          FIFTH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY SCHEDULE, SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, AND TRIAL DATE


          CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.

         This stipulation is entered into by and between the plaintiffs and the defendant and is based on the following facts:

         1. Plaintiffs have submitted a written settlement offer to defendant offering to settle all issues in this action. The Department of Justice, in concert with the Internal Revenue Service, is in the process of evaluating that settlement offer under its normal procedures.

         2. On February 2, 2009, the parties filed a stipulation (Document 49): (I) notifying this Court that the parties were continuing to work towards settlement; and (ii) requesting that this Court continue discovery and trial deadlines to avoid the substantial expenditure of resources and effort attendant to defendant's intended course of discovery and to allow time for the Department of Justice to complete its evaluation of plaintiffs' offer and to finalize any settlement.

         3. On February 4, 2009, this Court issued an order (Document 50) approving the stipulation to continue discovery and trial deadlines, and set the following revised calendar in this action:

Completion of Fact Discovery: June 15, 2009

Mandatory Settlement Conference on: July 17, 2009

Completion of Expert Discovery: October 16, 2009

Case-dispositive motions to be heard at 2:00 P.M. on: December 17, 2009

The pre-trial exchange between the parties will occur by: March 17, 2010

A pre-trial conference will be held on: April 20, 2010

A four-day Court Trial will begin at 8:30 A.M. on: May 10, 2010

         4. Notice from the Court's Clerk (Document 51) set the Mandatory Settlement Conference on June 23, 2009;

         5. On June 4, 2009, the parties filed a stipulation (Document 52): (I) notifying this Court that the parties were continuing to work towards settlement; and (ii) requesting that this Court continue discovery and trial deadlines to avoid the substantial expenditure of resources and effort attendant to defendant's intended course of discovery and to allow time for the Department of Justice to complete its evaluation of plaintiffs' offer and to finalize any settlement.

         6. On June 10, 2009, this Court issued an order (Document 53) approving the stipulation to continue discovery and trial deadlines, and set the following revised calendar in this action:

Completion of Fact Discovery: on or before October 15, 2009

Mandatory Settlement Conference no later than: November 17, 2009

Completion of Expert Discovery: on or before February 16, 2010

Case-dispositive motions and a further case management conference: 2:00 P.M. on April 8, 2010

The pre-trial exchange between the parties: pursuant to Court's Order for Pretrial Preparation

A pre-trial conference on: October 26, 2010 at 2:00 P.M.

A four-day Court Trial beginning at 8:30 A.M. on: November 15, 2010

         7. Following the request of the parties (Document 55), the Court entered an Order (Document 56) re-assigning this case to a Magistrate Judge. On July 15, 2009, the case was so re-assigned, and, on July 16, 2009, Chief United States Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James entered an Order (Document 57) scheduling a settlement conference for October 5, 2009, at 2:00 p.m. in Magistrate James' chambers.

         8. On September 17, 2009, the parties filed a stipulation (Document 58): (i) notifying this Court that the parties were continuing to work towards settlement; and (ii) requesting that this Court continue discovery and trial deadlines to allow the parties to work towards finalizing a settlement without simultaneously preparing for trial.

         9. On September 18, 2009, this Court issued an order (Document 59) approving the stipulation to continue discovery and trial deadlines, and set the following revised calendar in this action:

Completion of Fact Discovery: on or before February 15, 2010

Mandatory Settlement Conference no later than: March 17, 2010

Completion of Expert Discovery: on or before June 16, 2010

Case-dispositive motions and a further case management conference: 2:00 P.M. on August 12, 2010

The pre-trial exchange between the parties: pursuant to Court's Order for Pretrial Preparation

A pre-trial conference on: February 22, 2011 at 2:00 P.M.

A four-day Court Trial beginning at 8:30 A.M. on: March 14, 2011

         10. On September 25, 2009, the parties filed a stipulation (Document 60), notifying the Court that the settlement conference scheduled for October 5, 2009, had been rescheduled for March 2, 2010.

         11. All parties continue to believe that settlement is likely and continue to work diligently towards a final action by the Department of Justice on plaintiffs' offer to settle all issues in this case. Settlement efforts are continuing and there has been no breakdown of communications and no impasse has arisen.

         Plaintiffs recently provided documents that are necessary for defendant's analysis of plaintiffs' settlement offer. Plaintiffs are in the process of filing with the Internal Revenue Service all recently completed back tax returns that would be affected if their settlement offer is accepted. In addition, plaintiffs submitted to the defendant the recalculations of tax liability that form the bases for their settlement offer. Additional time is needed for defendant to review these materials and, if necessary, to seek information from plaintiffs about them.

         12. The parties appreciate the Court's patience as the parties work to finalize the settlement. The parties believe that requiring the parties to prepare for settlement conferences or trial would be counterproductive to reaching a settlement in this action.

         13. Based on the facts presented, the plaintiffs and the defendant request an extension of an additional four months for each of the existing deadlines.

         ORDER

         Based on the facts and stipulation set forth above,

         IT IS ORDERED:

         1. Fact Discovery shall be completed on or before: June 15, 2010;

         2. A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted before Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no later than July 19, 2010, at the convenience of Magistrate James' calendar;

         3. Expert Discovery shall be completed on or before: October 18, 2010;

         4. All case-dispositive motions and a further case management conference shall be heard at 2:00 P.M. on December 16, 2010;

         5. The pre-trial exchange between the parties shall occur in accordance with the Court's Order for Pretrial Preparation.

         6. A pre-trial conference will be held on: June 28, 2011, at 2:00 P.M.; and

         7. A four-day Court Trial will begin at 8:30 A.M. on: July 18, 2011.


Summaries of

Aws Management, LLC v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Feb 1, 2010
05-1056 CW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Aws Management, LLC v. United States

Case Details

Full title:AWS MANAGEMENT, LLC, by and through MARY CHANDLER PETTY, a Partner Other…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Feb 1, 2010

Citations

05-1056 CW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2010)