Avis, Inc. v. Graham

1 Citing case

  1. Graham Bros. c. Co. v. C. W. Matthews c. Co.

    159 Ga. App. 546 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)   Cited 18 times

    5. The trial court did not err in charging plaintiff's written request to charge that an action at law lies for breach of a contract and that damages are given as compensation for the injuries sustained. Avis, Inc. v. Graham, 217 Ga. 330, 331 (1) ( 122 S.E.2d 245); Chadwick v. Dolinoff, 207 Ga. 702, 703 (1) ( 64 S.E.2d 76). The elements of a right to recover for a breach of contract are the breach and the resultant damages to the party who has the right to complain about the contract being broken. See Selman v. Manis, 100 Ga. App. 422 (5) ( 111 S.E.2d 747). The court thereafter charged that of course it was up to the jury to decide under the evidence and law given as to whether there had been a breach of contract and, if so, whether damages have been sustained.