From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avildsen v. Prystay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 1998
256 A.D.2d 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 15, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.).


The motion court properly denied defendant's motion since the interest issue defendant wished to raise had previously been fully litigated and decided against her. The attempt by defense counsel to nonetheless relitigate the interest issue by filing a final judgment and then moving to modify the judgment and for a recalculation of interest was properly deserving of sanctions pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1. Clearly, counsel's actions were intentional and, in light of the circumstances of the case, lacked any legal or factual basis.

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Avildsen v. Prystay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 1998
256 A.D.2d 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Avildsen v. Prystay

Case Details

Full title:JOHN AVILDSEN, Respondent, v. MYROSLAWA PRYSTAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 521