From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avila v. Moghyuddin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 5, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-01686 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-01686 MCE CKD P

04-05-2018

LARRY AVILA, Plaintiff, v. A. MOGHYUDDIN, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed December 4, 2017, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and ///// ///// ///// Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: April 5, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12/avil1686.fusm.docx


Summaries of

Avila v. Moghyuddin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 5, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-01686 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2018)
Case details for

Avila v. Moghyuddin

Case Details

Full title:LARRY AVILA, Plaintiff, v. A. MOGHYUDDIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 5, 2018

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-01686 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2018)