From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avila v. Garza

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jan 18, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-cv-00056 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 18, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-cv-00056

01-18-2022

EMMANUEL AVILA, Petitioner, v. ERIC GARZA, ET AL., Respondents.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ROLANDO OLVERA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the “Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation” (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 29). The R&R recommends this Court (1) grant “Defendants Fermin Leal, Jose Luis Gracia & Emanuel Zepeda's Motion to Dismiss” (“Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 22) and (2) dismiss with prejudice Petitioner's claims against Defendants Fermin Leal, Jose Luis Gracia, and Emanuel Zepeda (“Defendants”).

Objections were due December 16, 2021. No objections were filed by either party. If there have been no objections to the magistrate's ruling, then the appropriate standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.” United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED.

Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED, and Petitioner's claims against Defendants Fermin Leal, Jose Luis Gracia, and Emanuel Zepeda are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Avila v. Garza

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jan 18, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-cv-00056 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Avila v. Garza

Case Details

Full title:EMMANUEL AVILA, “Petitioner, ” v. ERIC GARZA, ET AL., “Respondents.”

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Jan 18, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-cv-00056 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 18, 2022)