From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avila v. Acacia Network

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 12, 2024
23-CV-10260 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-10260 (LTS)

01-12-2024

JIMMY AVILA, Plaintiff, v. ACACIA NETWORK; AJA DOUGLAS; 1212 GRANT REALTY, LLC; MANNY STEIN; CAREN ABATE, OMH DIRECTOR OF HOUSING/NYC FIELD OFFICE, Defendants.


ORDER

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action by order to show cause, requesting preliminary injunctive relief. To obtain such relief, Plaintiff must show: (1) that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm and (2) either (a) a likelihood of success on the merits of his case or (b) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly in his favor. See UBS Fin. Servs., Inc. v. W.V. Univ. Hosps., Inc., 660 F.3d 643, 648 (2d Cir. 2011) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); Wright v. Giuliani, 230 F.3d 543, 547 (2000). Preliminary injunctive relief “is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, one that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” Moore v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc., 409 F.3d 506, 510 (2d Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Plaintiff's submissions do not demonstrate: (1) a likelihood of success on the merits, or (2) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly in his favor. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request for an order to show cause (ECF No. 3) is denied without prejudice. The Court will, at a later date, issue an order addressing the claims raised in Plaintiff's complaint.

CONCLUSION

Plaintiff's request for an order to show cause (ECF No. 3) is denied without prejudice.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Avila v. Acacia Network

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 12, 2024
23-CV-10260 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Avila v. Acacia Network

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY AVILA, Plaintiff, v. ACACIA NETWORK; AJA DOUGLAS; 1212 GRANT REALTY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 12, 2024

Citations

23-CV-10260 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2024)