From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avery v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
Case Number: 1:11cv848 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:11cv848

01-15-2013

Sandra Barber Avery, Plaintiff(s), v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant(s).


Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott


ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on December 12, 2012 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, the Administrative Law Judge committed no reversible error. The finding of non-disability is supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, therefore, the Commissioner's decision to deny Plaintiff DIB and SSI benefits is AFFIRMED. This case is hereby TERMINATED from the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court


Summaries of

Avery v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
Case Number: 1:11cv848 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Avery v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Sandra Barber Avery, Plaintiff(s), v. Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

Case Number: 1:11cv848 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)

Citing Cases

Bowen v. Colvin

Thus, contrary to Claimant's position, it does not necessarily follow that Claimant must be able to…